lucymonster: (horrorsinhouse)
Forbidden Fruits 2026: Comedy horror, heavily stylised movie about four young fashion retail workers whose leader, Apple, has them ensnared in a secretive, controlling witches' coven. It was definitely saying something about toxic female friendships, but what exactly that something was, I'm not sure I could tell you. It was very pretty, very vibes-based and not particularly coherent. (Admittedly, I watched it drunk.)

I enjoyed myself anyway, especially because Lili Reinhart is absolutely amazing as Apple. But I was hoping for something more, idk, The Craft meets Mean Girls, which I think is actually what the movie was trying to be, and in the end it just didn't quite get there.

Bodies Bodies Bodies (2022): Also comedy horror. A group of rich, dumb, very dramatic Gen Z friends lock themselves away in a remote mansion for a hurricane party; they are playing what's supposed to be an innocent game of murder in the dark when bodies start turning up for real. This is Glass Onion for morons, in the absolute BEST possible way. I have a lot of affection for Amandla Stenberg from her twin roles in The Acolyte, but she is one of those actors who gives off very strong "knows about TikTok" vibes even when she's running around with a lightsaber, so it was nice to see her sink her teeth into a role where knowing about TikTok was part of the point. She really shone as the troubled, newly sober lesbian protagonist/final girl whose relationships with the group were falling apart even before people started dropping dead.

Us (2019): All horror, no comedy by Jordan Peele starring Lupita Nyong'o. The Wilson family are enjoying a coastal holiday when a family of doppelgängers show up in their driveway hellbent on killing the people whose existence has unwittingly been keeping them enslaved. The doppelgängers, called the Tethered, come from a mysterious underworld and share a soul with their above-world doubles; everything their double does, each of them is forced to perform a twisted simulacrum of, all while trapped in a miserable prison-like space and wearing orange jumpsuits.

I went into this one with extensive spoilers because of the kid characters, and yet I somehow managed not to spoil myself for the final twist, which I'm...not sure if I like or not? I really enjoyed the shock of the reveal, but the longer I've dwelt on it, the more I feel it not just subverts but actually contradicts some of what the movie told us previously. With or without the ending, though, it was a fantastic film and Lupita Nyong'o was breathtakingly good as Adelaide and Red.

Bonus DNF is a thriller, not a horror movie, but I also recently attempted Gravity (2013) - about the sole survivor of an ill-fated mission on the Hubble Space Telescope - and got about halfway through before the stress became too much. Even Sandra Bullock putting in an absolutely amazing performance as a scientist and first time astronaut was not enough to make the sheer cortisol overload worth it for me (and admittedly, my ability to invest in her was hampered by having to fast-forward through her backstory because child death). I love space exploration! I have enjoyed other survival thrillers! But the pacing of this one was just utterly relentless, and the dangers excruciatingly drawn-out, and in the end I couldn't do it.
lucymonster: (watchingthroughfingers)
I have broken free of my horror movie slump with two really wonderful, nuanced films about troubled women being tormented by personified manifestations of our collective cultural anxieties. And also a haunted asylum adventure that was only okay and doesn't really belong in the same post as these masterpieces, but my list of things I want to post about (or more accurately, to HAVE posted about) is so drastically outstripping my willingness to actually sit down and post at the moment that I can't afford to be choosy.

Smile 2 (2024): Hat tip to [personal profile] snickfic for advising me to give this sequel a chance after being fairly underwhelmed by the first one. Smile 2 takes the concept - supernatural entity with a creepy smile latches onto its victim, torments them for a few days, then transmits itself to the next victim by forcing the current one to commit gory suicide in front of them - in a much more interesting direction through its protagonist Skye Riley (Naomi Scott), a pop star trying to make a comeback after an extremely messy public breakdown resulting in a drug-fueled car crash that killed her celebrity boyfriend. Scott brings so much complexity and realistic psychological anguish to Skye's miserable gilded cage life, and the film is deeply interested in complicity: Skye's, as she continues to stake her life on fame and success even as they crush her; her mother, whose standing on the selfless-supporter-to-nightmare-stage-parent spectrum is never entirely resolved; the in-universe public, reducing Skye's painful human struggles to a source of entertainment; us, the real viewers, who can all easily name at least half a dozen real female celebrities we have personally watched get flushed down the same toilet. Being chased by a demonic smiling entity that no one but you can see, that fucks with your grip on reality and isolates you from every possible source of support, feels like such a tailor-made metaphor for life as a beautiful young woman under intense public scrutiny that it's honestly kind of bizarre this is a sequel instead of the original idea for which the Smile universe was made.

Saccharine (2026): Med student Hana is trapped in a spiral of disordered eating when she learns of an obscure new weight loss pill called "grey" that causes the kilos to fall off no matter how much you eat. Unable to afford the branded pills, Hana analyses one in the university lab to discover it's made of human ash, then steals from a donated cadaver to manufacture her own. But as her weight loss dreams start to magically come true, she is haunted by menacing visions of the morbidly obese donor whose body she has been consuming in five gram increments.

Fatphobia is obviously a complicated topic with no one-size-fits-all (no pun intended) answer. I don't know how this film would feel to watch as a "true" fat person, and while stridently critical of diet culture, it is not exactly aligned with the body positivity movement. It seems to me (maybe due to personal bias) laser-targeted towards women who wear standard sizes and can shop in mainstream clothing stores but feel painfully aware of the extra padding they carry compared to the beauty standard. Women for whom thinness is only barely, tantalisingly, out of reach, whose ideal weights would be only a few short months away if they could just somehow manage to shed a perfectly healthy one kilo per week, but whose cravings and binges and obsessive love-hate relationship with food keeps tugging them off track and into pits of counterproductive self-loathing. All the long, unflinching close-up shots of Hannah eating - the way they always teetered on this knife's edge of hedonistic bliss and despairing revulsion - were emotionally shattering and almost unbearably relatable as a viewer with her own history of food-related fuckedupness. I loved, too, the exploration of how Hana's body image issues poisoned her sexuality as a same sex attracted woman, making it almost impossible for her to distinguish between women she was attracted to and women she wished she could be. And - again, I think this is a device more sensitive to viewers on the small side of overweight than the larger - but I really loved and appreciated how Hana's twisted need to dehumanise those much fatter than her was drawn to the surface: the cadaver is simultaneously an object of revulsion and a product she literally consumes for her own ends, and it's a painful, long-overdue slap in the face when the monstrous corpse she and her classmates have insultingly nicknamed "Big Bertha" is finally shown as a real human being with a complex life story and people who loved her and still cherish her memory.

The ending was not what I yearned for, but damn, the story earnt it.

Grave Encounters (2011): Eh. This was fine. It's another found footage horror, tracking a crew of paranormal investigators who go to film an episode of their TV show in an old asylum and run into rather more paranormal activity than they bargained for. Mostly I was amused by the dated MTV-core of it, and how accurately they captured the essence of wildly overacted 2000s-era American reality shows. It was mildly entertaining but not one I'm ever going to feel the need to rewatch, I don't think.
lucymonster: (watchingthroughfingers)
I've had a run of bad luck with my movie choices lately. There's been nothing since my last horror post that I've really enjoyed, and a few attempts so brief and unimpressive that I won't even count them as DNFs. Here are three I did at least get through:

The Conspiracy (2012): This mockumentary follows two journalists who are investigating the phenomenon of conspiracy theories from a skeptical viewpoint when they unfortunately discover that there really is an evil cabal running the world. Most of this was so well done that it had me feeling momentary genuine sympathy for conspiracy nuts - they made it all sound SO compelling in the collected footage! But the final act was just plain stupid. I'm sorry. There's no other word for it. And it wasn't even particularly scary in the end, because the cabal stuff and the "twist" re: how the documentary supposedly got itself released were so unconvincing that they completely broke my suspension of disbelief.

Evil Dead (2013): Struggling addict Mia gathers two close childhood friends, her brother and her brother's new girlfriend all together at the old family cabin to support her as she gets clean. They arrive to find the cabin broken into, a bunch of dead cats strung up in the basement, and an ominous leatherbound book that has been fastened closed with thick barbed wire. One bright spark from among the group deems it good to break the book out of its restraints, browse through its pages and pages of dire red-inked warnings and gruesome illustrations, then recite aloud an incantation in a mysterious language that some previous user of the book has tried very, very hard to scratch out. You guys aren't going to believe this but it turns out the book is an evil book that summons the devil! Mia promptly becomes possessed, by way of an evil thorn bush that traps her with her legs spread so that an evil vine can crawl up her vagina. Carnage ensues.

This was, as I suspected, too gory for me - but only just! The unpleasant kind of too gory, not the traumatic kind of too gory. I'm slightly annoyed by how little I liked it, because scary occult books and libraries have been a favourite trope of mine since primary school. If they'd spent more time chewing on the lore I'd have probably enjoyed it enough to make up for the violence, which was so gross, brutal and implausably ~creative that it almost tipped over into unintentional comedy. I understand this is a reboot of the 80s trilogy which is actually comedic on purpose, so maybe I'll like that better? But this one was a wash and I honestly only finished it because I'd already DNF'd a couple of movies and I wanted to finish SOMETHING.

Blair Witch (2016): The brother of a woman who went missing along with her documentary-making team while camping in Black Hills Forest takes his own documentary-making team to go camping in Black Hills Forest in the hopes of finding out what happened to her. And, well, he absolutely does find out! This is a direct sequel to (and beat-for-beat rehash of) The Blair Witch Project, and I watched it against my better judgement because a horror youtuber was gushing about how underrated it is. I'm afraid I'll have to side with the majority on this one. The basic premise seems to be that if you take all the ambiguous terror of the original and make it more direct and concrete - "dial it up", or whatever - then you'll get something even scarier. So instead of the victims being bewilderingly lost, unable to keep track of time or distance, we're explicitly told that time and distance are being manipulated by magic. Instead of the Blair Witch being a lurking unseen horror, she appears on screen this time as a fairly bog-standard cryptid. Instead of a short, sharp final foray into the old Rustin Parr house and the descent into insane wall-staring behaviour, we get long chase sequences down indistinguishable corridors and an explanation that the Blair Witch can only get you if you look at her, therefore wall-staring is an entirely rational safety measure. I assume it's clear from the tone of my recap that I did not, in fact, find any of these revisions scarier than the original at all. It was an absolute nothingburger of a film and I don't think my pulse spiked even once.

The worst immersion-breaker, though, was how they did the found footage this time. Again, they seem to have been working from the guiding principle that more is more: instead of the highly realistic, easily tracked camera use of the first film, they now had headcams on every character and a drone overhead that supposedly justified near comprehensive coverage of every scene, with perfectly framed close-ups and well timed zoom-ins and a whole bunch of scenes where I honestly couldn't tell whose camera was supposed to be filming it or how it got into that position. I'm not exactly a cinematographer or a keen observer of technical details, so I feel like if I'm watching your film going "these camera movements just don't make sense", you have probably screwed up something fairly major.

And a couple of notable DNFs: Insidious (I tried really hard to keep going because I've heard such good things, but the stressed-out SAHM and her poor crying baby got under my skin in a way that wasn't fun), Triangle (sad little kid in the very first scene, never a good sign!) and Unsane (I am down for "am I actually crazy" angst under many circumstances, but an upsettingly grounded involuntary psych hold while on the run from a stalker is apparently not one of them). All three seemed like pretty good films so to be fair this is more about my personal squicks than a quality-based rejection, but yeah.

Maybe to break this streak I should go back and rewatch some of the small handful of horror flicks I managed to watch in my whole life prior to this year's sudden hyperfixation. I know for a fact that Psycho is not going to disappoint me, for instance! I remember The Exorcism of Emily Rose being quite good, as well. And I've never seen a Dracula adaptation I didn't like. Or maybe I need a break and to watch some non-horror for a while. IDEK. Maybe I should rewatch some Star Wars! Star Wars never lets me down!
lucymonster: (watchingthroughfingers)
Still catching up with my backlog. Theme is, um. *points upwards*

Midsommar (2019): This is one of the most striking horror movies I've watched to date. Grieving the loss of her parents and sister in a horrific murder-suicide, Dani joins her boyfriend (an anthropology PhD whose plans to break up with her were also interrupted by the deaths) on a boys' trip to rural Sweden, to celebrate the summer solstice with the pagan cult in which one of the friends was raised. Everything is sun-drenched and floral, the cultists all clad in serene white and perpetually smiling; the warm welcome they show Dani contrasts starkly with the barely veiled indifference of her boyfriend and the contempt of his friends. It's all so perfectly idyllic - and yet, they're a cult, and this is a horror movie. So naturally the visit goes GREAT. :)))

Florence Pugh is amazing as Dani. The scene at the beginning, when she first receives the news about her family, was such a gut-wrenchingly real, raw depiction of grief that I only barely managed not to nope out. Her shitty boyfriend was finding her too needy even before she lost her whole family; she's under constant pressure to put on the most coping front she can, painfully aware that her "support network" sees her as a burden. Spoilers )

Smile (2022): As far as I can tell, this film got made because someone reached the end credits of It Follows and said "Great, now take it from the top, but a bit less good this time." Dr. Rose Cotter, a psychologist working in an emergency mental health unit, contracts a sort of contagious demon from one of her patients. The entity follows you around for a few days, appearing in the form of different people smiling the same creepy smile at you. Then it takes over your body and forces you to commit gruesome suicide in front of a witness, who then becomes the entity's next victim. The supposed irony of Rose's professional background - she treats crazy people, but now everyone thinks she's crazy! Cue Alanis! - is milked for all the heavy-handed messaging about mental health stigma it can possibly yield. There are a shitton of jumpscares. That's about it.

Here's a screencap of the creepy smile. If that image scares you in a way that you'd like to experience more of, then it's by no means a bad use of ~2hrs of your life! I had a pretty good time, to be honest, but it was all empty calories. It's probably not one I'm going to feel moved to rewatch.

Late Night with the Devil (2023): A 1970s late night talk show host, played by David Dastmalchian, gets more than he bargained for when he invites a possessed girl to appear on his Halloween special in the hopes of boosting his flagging ratings. This was good solid fun with great acting and some great campy scares. I wasn't 100% sold on the surreal twist in the final act, but that's more of a "this wasted its chance to end stronger" complaint rather than actively detracting from the film, if that makes sense. I liked it a lot! And I'd like to see more of Dastmalchian, I think. The only other role of his I've seen is when he played Gurathin in Murderbot, and since I hated the adaptation in general and his character specifically, I don't think that appearance did him justice. He acted the HELL out of this.

I'm also very interested to see more of Ingrid Torelli, who played the possessed girl. She's young and very early in her career so there's not exactly much backlog to delve into, but I found her extremely charismatic. And apparently she's Australian! We're such a horror powerhouse. Go us. :')

We Bury the Dead (2024): Speaking of Australian horror... The US accidentally deploys an experimental weapon off the coast of Tasmania, killing literally every single life form on the whole island. Daisy Ridley plays an American woman, Ava, whose husband was staying south of Hobart on a work retreat when it happened, and who has come to join the body retrieval effort to find him. On arrival Ava quickly learns that rumours of some of the dead coming back to life as zombies are true, and also that Hobart is still on fire and the army won't be letting anyone travel south until the flames are out. Unwilling to wait that long once she sees some of the zombies showing signs of what look like self-awareness, hoping desperately to find her husband resurrected and still himself, she and the wildcard fellow retrievalist she has bonded with give their unit the slip and set off alone for the husband's resort.

I watched this mainly for Daisy Ridley and did NOT expect to love it as much as I did. I spent the first few minutes uncharitably annoyed because Ava showed up in an Australia that has literally just lost, like, a full percentage of our population in a tragedy caused by her shithole fucking country (sorry US friends I love youse really) and immediately started trying to play the sympathy card about her bereavement to the visibly exhausted Australian soldier manning the registration desk, thinking she could get a super special exemption to go look for ONLY her husband and not be bothered to pitch in with the rest of the cleanup effort. (Australia is of course in no way the primary or intended victim of the American cultural tendency to view the whole rest of the world as a painted backdrop on which American stories, the stories that matter, play out - but we have taken enough collateral over the years that I have some bad feelings pent up, okay.) But I got past that quickly because 1) grief can make self-absorbed jerks of everyone, not just Americans and 2) her bullshit did actually get called out later in the film. Meanwhile, the meat of the story turned out to be that spoilers ) The zombies aren't really the source of much of the horror at all, and the ending left me so fucking happy, in a way that I would never have expected from a zombie flick.

I think We Bury the Dead and Midsommar are tied for my favourites in this post, and are probably up there with my favourites of this year's whole horror binge so far.

Movie post

Jul. 9th, 2026 01:48 pm
lucymonster: (watchingthroughfingers)
Two new horror films have just opened up in local theatres, and I am debating whether to go and see them. (Saccharine will either be just what I want right now or will set my own body image issues spiraling; Evil Dead Burn is almost certainly too gory for me, but I'm fighting a reckless urge to ~test myself.) In the meantime, here's what I've been watching at home on a smaller screen:

Conclave (2024): The Pope dies; the Cardinals gather at the Vatican to elect a new one; much political intrigue occurs, and much anguishing of consciences. Ralph Fiennes carried this whole film as the convenor of the conclave, while Carlos Diehz supplied the pontifical eye candy as a badass (by ageing Catholic dude standards) newcomer who had been secretly appointed to the perilous archbishopric of Kabul after a career spent ministering in war and disaster zones. Very fun and tense and aesthetic. I do not have much else to say.

Black Death (2010): This entertainingly heavy-handed medieval action/horror stars Sean Bean as a Catholic warrior on a mission to catch a necromancer accused of using black magic to shield a whole village from the ravages of plague, and Eddie Redmayne as a novice from a nearby local monastery who volunteers to guide him to the village. It starts out as a gritty, filthy, dark historical adventure that takes the adventurers' faith very seriously, before eventually dissolving into an unintentional horror-comedy of Evil Pagans(TM) railing against the Church and trying to torture and trying to force the Christians to renounce God under threat of death and torture, while the Christians are all Vaderesque NOOOOOOOOOO, I'll never renounce God!!!!! Carice van Houten (the Evil Pagan(TM) queen) is so attractive it should be illegal. The twist end was...quite satisfying, actually! I can't take any of it too seriously but it was a very enjoyable watch.

Thesis (1996): Spanish horror/thriller about film student Ángela who, while exploring cinematic depictions of extreme violence for her thesis, stumbles across the existence of a snuff production ring operating in her university. Ángela is in deep denial about her fascination with death and gore and seems confused as to her own moral position; her impulse is to bury her head in the sand and forget all about the horrible criminal discovery. Her classmate Chema, an unabashed horror fan and collector of assorted video nasties, feels obliged to investigate. It is all very meta, and at times seems to be deliberately taunting the audience - many a time the camera will pan slowly towards a sight we are told is unspeakably grisly, only to dart away at the last possible second.

And some DNFs: I watched about half an hour of The Rite because I was in the mood for more films in the vein of The Exorcist, but it ended up being so much in the vein of The Exorcist (right down to the sad brown-haired young priest who boxes to work out and is the middle of a crisis of faith) that I was mostly bored by the time a heavily pregnant woman wandered on-screen and I realised I had recklessly forgotten to check if the movie had child death in it, so I paused and checked and...yeah, that's a nope. I started watching Send Help with high hopes, but the first few minutes were devoted to that guy from Teen Wolf being the most infuriatingly horrible business bro and my blood pressure couldn't take it. That is NOT the kind of stressed out I want to be while watching a horror movie! The Invisible Man was also the wrong kind of stressful, in a different way: Imagine you're dating Tony Stark, and he's a complete abusive psycho! (No thank you, I will not be imagining that.) Finally I watched a bit of The Cabin in the Woods, but the Whedonesque vibes just weren't what I was in the mood for - I may come back to this one at a later date, though, since it's such a classic.
lucymonster: (horror)
Leviticus (2026): Recently uprooted by his mother to a conservative Australian industrial town, Naim finds teen love with local boy Ryan. When he catches Ryan also hooking up with the pastor's son, Naim outs both other boys to their parents in retaliation, and the parents call in a faith healer to "cure" their sons of homosexual urges. But what the ritual actually does is summon a violent entity, visible only to the victim, that takes the appearance of whoever they're most attracted to and stalks them relentlessly with murderous intent.

This was both tragic and terrifying, though to be honest I'm still having trouble deciding whether Australian horror scares me so much more than other films because there's something objectively scarier about the films I'm choosing, or whether it just gets me more because the horror is happening to Normal People in Normal Places. (Non-Aussie friends, I'd be interested to compare notes!) Either way, this one joins the so far very short list of horror films that have required a genuine exertion of will for me to finish watching - not "flinch and cover my eyes" scary, but "flee the cinema and don't look back or else It's Going To Get Me" scary. Which is SUCH an endorphin rush once the fear finally wears off, lol. People online are understandably comparing Leviticus to the premise of It Follows, but I feel like they're doing fairly different things with the superficially similar premise: It Follows deconstructs the Sex Equals Death trope, while Leviticus gives Christian homophobia a literal demonic embodiment. The fact that the entity convincingly imitates your actual lover, instead of shifting forms arbitrarily, is a particularly sadistic twist. I walked out of the cinema unsure how much I actually liked the movie - it was so many emotions at once that "liking" feels almost beside the point - but the more I turn it over in my head, the more positive I feel.

I did have some quibbles with the way the exposition was done - certain supporting characters knew things about the entity that I wasn't convinced they should actually know given what they said about their own sources, and a couple of developments were skimmed over so quickly that I thought they were plotholes until I carefully combed over them again in retrospect. Those moments were a little immersion-breaking. But overall...yeah, I think this might have been pretty damn excellent, actually. I REALLY liked the sweeping shots of the town that showed off its desolation, and the industrial machinery sounds woven into the score. It was all very atmospheric and a very grounded, distinctive aesthetic.

Obsession (2026): Teenage boy Bear flippantly wishes for his crush to love him more than anyone in the world, on a magic object that turns out to actually work. Naturally, this turns into a horrific monkey's paw situation; Nikki's behaviour quickly turns possessive and unsettling, and then, when she feels their relationship under threat, truly frightening.

I am thoroughly on board with the great reception this film has been receiving. Partly because it's really fun, effective horror - Nikki's weird body movements, holy shit - and partly because I like the nuance in the underlying gender conversation. It feels like it's speaking to both sides of the post-#MeToo dating landscape: to the young women who are all too aware of the danger men pose in their lives (Nikki, helpless and humiliated and sexually exploited, is by the end shown pretty clearly as the primary victim), and also to the young men who are coming to understand their responsibilities a little better but still aren't fully ready to let go of all their gendered entitlement and also feel aggrieved by the sense that they're being cast as villains. On the surface Bear is also a pitiable victim of the wish, which he made without any expectation of it working and which in the end he proved willing to pay an extremely high price to redress. But in the middle there...hoo, boy. For a disturbingly long time after he realises the wish really worked, his hope is to alter rather than cancel it - to keep Nikki under his spell, but just to dial down the intensity of her magically induced obsession. The part that hit me most viscerally wasn't the gore, but the scene that cuts abruptly from Bear learning that pre-wish Nikki was confirmedly not attracted to him, to him forcefully fucking her while she moans in glassy-eyed ecstasy. It's just...ugh. Yuck.

And then again, as becomes increasingly clear as their relationship goes on, Bear does not actually have the choice to walk away from Nikki once the obsession has taken hold. Her behaviour towards him while under the influence of the wish is straight-up domestic abuse. It's such a mess. I love mess. This was great.
lucymonster: (horror)
Backrooms (2026): I loved this!!! Admittedly, my reception has been coloured by the sheer delight of getting to go see it in theatre; I was able to book the perfect seat in an otherwise empty row, I treated myself to a big cup of mixed lollies in a fit of childlike exuberance, and all in all a great time was had while my husband generously managed the kids' bedtime alone. Under those circumstances the movie would have had to be very bad indeed before it would have dented my joy, but I do think it was genuinely good - especially for something made by a twenty-year-old youtuber.

Based on an internet creepypasta that I'd never heard of in my life but that is apparently hugely popular with Gen Z, Backrooms is about a struggling furniture store owner who passes through a wall in the back of his shop and finds himself in a liminal space of huge, labyrinthine office rooms that are just Not Quite Right: the architecture is all off-kilter, everything is faded yellow, and the space is completely empty aside from the scattering of random items in unlikely places throughout. His therapist gets roped into it as well, and two of his young employees. The ambience and sound design are key to the horror: not a lot of action happens, but the visual wrongness never lets up, and the awful noises made by the Mysterious Thing that stalks the backrooms had me clutching the armrests. If I get a second chance at an evening out then I am going to spend it on Obsession, but a part of me kind of wishes I could go back and see this one on the big screen again.

As Above, So Below (2014): My trip to see Backrooms was a second attempt at an evening out; the first one fell over, and As Above, So Below was my streamable-at-home consolation prize, plucked from a "You're obsessed with Backrooms, now what's next?" listicle. I can see their point, but the tone could hardly be more different and for me this one scratched a completely different itch. It's about a rogue archaeologist and her thrown-together team of urban explorers who blunder into a haunted hell dimension while searching the Paris catacombs for the Philosopher's Stone. It is ridiculous, corny, historically incompetent, and overall spooky as fuck. Someone clearly said, "Imagine if Indiana Jones was a beautiful twentysomething woman! And imagine if her tomb runs were even scarier and more deadly! No, don't worry about the plot, we're going for Vibes here, it doesn't have to withstand even three seconds of scrutiny! Also, I can get us approval to film in the actual real catacombs!" And then they took that as a mission statement and committed to it with their whole heart and soul. It was so dumb. I had such a good time.

The one misstep that I did actually take issue with was the choice to frame it as found footage. I get the vision, I do! But the script and the acting and the overall story are just way too campy to pass as subject matter for low-lit handcams. Absolutely no one is mistaking these people as real. They are actors reading lines. They are so, so obviously actors reading lines. They are having earnest dialogue about Nicholas fucking Flamel! The found footage conceit kept breaking my ability to immerse myself in the camp, and the camp kept breaking my ability to immerse myself in the found footage, and I think ultimately it would have been a much stronger movie if they'd just scrapped the handcams and accepted that nothing about the project was going to lend itself to realism. It should have been shot like the 80s-action/adventure-inspired brain candy it was.
lucymonster: (horror)
A book as well as two more movies! I'm off my sickbed now and a bit movie'd out for the time being, so this will probably be the last of the deluge.

The Hollow Places by T. Kingfisher: Trying to get back on her feet after a divorce, thirtysomething Kara (nicknamed Carrot) goes to stay with her eccentric Uncle Earl and help him run his small-town museum of curiosities. She and her new friend Simon (a flamboyantly gay barista from the café next door) are repairing a hole in the museum's drywall when they discover a secret passageway on the other side of the hole that leads to a mysterious other world. At first, they think they've stumbled into a sort of Narnia. They very quickly learn that the truth is much darker.

I'm coming to think of Kingfisher as an author with a very strong brand; every book of hers I've read so far has featured some combination of relatable millennial protagonist (usually sorting herself out after the end of a bad relationship), lovable elderly mentor, casually queer supporting cast, quirky sense of humour, cute-but-has-attitude animal companion, and worldbuilding that straddles the line between horror, fantasy and fairytale. It's a lot of fun to read and has left me with a lovely cosy feeling despite the fairly extreme body horror scares along the way.

The Hitch-Hiker (1953): More thriller/noir than horror, but this seventy minutes of three men driving car through (as far as I can tell) the same stretch of American desert multiple times in a row was up there with many a lauded horror flick for how hard it made me sweat. Serial killer Emmett Myers poses as a hitch-hiker and forces two blokes on a fishing trip to drive him to a port city from which he plans to flee the country. There is something so satisfying about older movies that have not yet fallen prey to our exaggerated modern action/adventure norms: the fact that Myers has a gun he's willing to use is taken really fucking seriously. Nobody is badass-karate-disarming this guy. Not even when he’s asleep, in case he wakes up and shoots them. The lack of daring hand-to-hand combat does not make the film one iota less exciting.

The Shallows (2016): Blake Lively plays a surfer with no survival instincts, who hitch-hikes solo with a strange man in a foreign country whose language she barely speaks to get to a secret beach where no one knows to look for her. When this fails to get her killed, she goes out in the surf and stays there even after the local surfers who know the conditions have called it quits for the night and advised her to do the same. She sees a dead whale floating in the water and swims right up to it to investigate, and in doing so, royally pisses off the massive great white shark feeding on the carcass. She manages to get up onto a tiny rock island that is only above water at low tide, but the shark now sees her as a threat to its hunting ground (I have no idea how accurate this is in terms of shark psychology, though suspicion tells me Probably Not Very) and is so obsessed with killing her that it loses interest in the whale. This was very fun and very dumb and made me love not being a surfer even more than I already do. You will never, EVER catch me out there in water deep enough for sharks. Fun fact, this movie was shot in Australia! Motherfuckers are like, “Oh, Australia is so scary, all the snakes and spiders want to kill you!” and then they come here and go surfing. I have literally never even heard of anyone being harmed by a snake or spider. I personally know a guy who was bitten and almost killed by a shark.
lucymonster: (freddy)
(Yup, still sick and out of commission. Here are three more silver linings.)

Host (2020): As my horror binge has continued, I've already started to notice diminishing returns on the actual fear element - desensitisation, you know? But this one gave me a good hard scare. Set during the COVID pandemic, it's a little under an hour long and confined entirely to a Zoom call between a group of friends who have decided to conduct a virtual seance. The seance works. Aside from being scary as fuck, I really enjoyed how the film made use of the weirdness of life during lockdowns: new relationships forced to turn prematurely cohabitating, established friendships strained by distance, one of the characters reflexively stopping in the middle of a terrifying demonic manifestation to put on her mask before leaving the house. The storytelling is super lo-fi and pared-down, and I think it's a really good example of how a simple idea done cheaply and right can outperform many more lavish productions.

Halloween (1978): I have now watched the first instalments of all the "big three" teen slasher franchises, and this was by far my favourite. Michael Myers is an ontologically evil six-year-old who murders his teenage sister right after she's done having sex. Fifteen years later, he escapes from an insane asylum and goes back home to kill a bunch more teenagers before, during or immediately after sex. Jamie Lee Curtis is such a lovable Final Girl in this, and the music has to be up there with some of the most memorable movie theme songs of all time. I think I disagree very firmly with John Carpenter's conjecture that a pure, inhuman killing machine would be scarier than an actual character with actual motives, but I do admire the total lack of pretence to deeper meaning. Sometimes you want to watch "elevated" horror with Themes and Meaningful Stakes and shit; other times you just want to watch a monster in a mask cut people up for no reason.

White Zombie (1932): Did you guys know that zombies originate from Haitian folklore? Because I did not! In their original form, they are not plague-spreaders or brain-eaters but cheap, mindless labour in thrall to the sorcerers who raised them; early Western use of the lore seems to have revolved around zombies being forced to work on sugar plantations. In White Zombie, the first ever zombie movie, that is exactly what's happening. But one plantation owner takes the exploitation further when he enlists the help of sorcerer Bela Lugosi to zombify Madeleine, the newlywed woman he's obsessed with, and compel her into his romantic servitude. It is a gloriously silly story, shoddily produced by contemporary standards and almost comical by today's; I loved it anyway, not least for the maiden-in-trailing-gown-traipses-sadly-through-massive-gothic-castle vibes it delivered par excellence. And Bela Lugosi is, as always, brilliant. His smug, smirking expressions managed to be simultaneously hilarious and intimidating; I feel like even in intentional comedy-horror, those two emotions usually have to take turns? Good times.
lucymonster: (troopers)
(When I start posting streams of film reviews all at once, just assume I'm in bed with a virus. That seems to be the way of things at the moment.)

Casablanca (1942): Casablanca, my beloved! I have previously seen and loved chunks of this movie but never, as far as I can remember, watched it the whole way through. It is so good. So utterly charming. Rick is an American expat who runs a popular café/bar in Vichy-controlled Casablanca, Morocco during WWII. After having had his heart broken by his beautiful ex-girlfriend Ilsa, Rick presents himself as a hardened cynic, out for himself and indifferent to the plight of all the refugees pouring through the city in their desperate efforts to escape from wartorn Europe. The act is not especially convincing. He has a long track record of fighting for the antifascist side in recent other wars, and is surrounded by a small core group of friends and employees who have been with him for years and to whom he is clearly unswervingly loyal. Nevertheless, he manages to more or less keep up the pretence until Ilsa unexpectedly shows up in town on the arm of Victor Laszlo, a famous Czech Resistance fighter who is on the run from the Nazis. Rick has it in his power to get Ilsa and Laszlo the visas they need to escape to America. Local Vichy and German leaders are bearing down on him. His own bitter feelings about Ilsa's betrayal tempt him closer to the dark side than any political pressure ever has. But the ending is perfect, and the whole film plays with the tension between political ideals and personal desire in the most touching, human way.

I need to watch a bunch more Humphrey Bogart films. He's just so unbelievably charismatic, and has a knack for turning roles that could be obnoxious into lovable forever favourites.

Violation (2020): Spoilery plot summary )

The only other rape-revenge movies I've seen so far are the I Spit On Your Grave remakes, and this was like their perfect polar opposite. The rapist is a normal dude who has a close established friendship with his victim; the rape is "non-violent" and papered over as a misunderstanding. The film basically took a death-grip hold of that "was it ~really rape, did it ~count as a trauma, is it actually my fault, did I not fight hard enough" feeling so endemic to our rape culture and did not loosen it for even a moment - fucking harrowing stuff, but harrowing in a completely different way than a more graphic, brutal rape scene is harrowing. There's a far heavier focus on the relationships involved than on the act of sexual violence; Miriam's strained bonds with her sister and husband seem as much a part of the trauma as her brother-in-law's betrayal. Most of the screentime is devoted to long, almost painfully intimate scenes of completely mundane human interactions. Miriam's revenge by contrast is almost surreal: she executes a meticulously planned murder and disposes of the body with nauseating thoroughness. Far from catharsis, the murder only seems to traumatise her worse than ever.

The cinematography was exquisite, albeit heavy-handed. I am not film literate enough to know what to properly call this but it felt like the audio-visual equivalent of what in a novel we might call MFA writing: polished to an almost distracting shine, packed full of "elevated" metaphors, reluctant to say anything in a simple character beat that could instead be said through several long minutes of obscure atmospheric shots. Extremely pretty! Very artistic! SO pretentious! There is one quite surprising scene immediately before the murder where we zoom in super close on the rapist's naked erection. I don't think I've ever seen a head-on shot of an erect penis outside of porn. I thought the choice to show that so explicitly was an interesting contrast to the rape scene, which was filmed in this uncomfortably evocative, eroticised but completely non-explicit way: lots of heavy breathing, undulating fabric, grabbing hands, zero other skin on display.

I have loved nonlinear narratives in written fiction and I'm sure there are many ways I'd love them in film; in this case it felt like one abstraction too many, and I had a much better time once I gave up around the one-third mark and looked up a linear plot summary on Wikipedia. I guess in summary I'm not entirely sure what I make of this film, but watching it sure was an Experience.
lucymonster: (horror)
American Psycho (2000): Christian Bale puts on a mesmerising performance as Patrick Bateman, a wealthy young investment banker who moonlights as a serial killer. Bateman is an empty shell of vapid, consumerist narcissism: he obsesses over his personal grooming routine, competes with other men his age on metrics too petty for the healthy human mind to grasp (there's a running bit about business cards, where the mere sight of a shade of off-white deemed more tasteful than his own is enough to send Bateman spiralling in panicked rage), admires himself in the mirror during sex, and romanticises his own dysfunction by inwardly preening over what an emotionless monster he is. He murders with abandon for no reason whatsoever. He is not a reliable narrator. It's a mindfuck, and a biting satire of American business culture, and an all-around rollicking good time.

I really cannot overexaggerate how good Bale's acting is in this. It's his speech pattern that gets me the most: he absolutely nails that weird cadence typical of a certain kind of insecure young man for whom everything is a performance, who is deeply invested in projecting power and status but has no deep-rooted sense of self to draw from and so has to rely on rote imitation of more charismatic speakers. Every word is too polished, too carefully modulated. It's an aural uncanny valley; before you even see him throw a single tantrum about the superior quality of another guy's card stock, just from hearing him speak, you know he's a fucking joke. That said, I understand this film belongs to the same canon as movies like Fight Club and Joker, where a certain (ahem) demographic of the audience has somehow managed to Matrix-dodge their way around the point and adopted the protagonist as an icon of masculinity. I wish that surprised me more, but the world is also full of fascists who unironically identify with Luke Skywalker, so. Some men have simply got their minds made up to be stupid, and no satirical arrow in the world is sharp enough to pierce their armour. Doesn't change the fact that this is a really good movie.

Rogue (2007): When I DNF'd Black Water a while ago, it was because THIS was the crocodile movie I actually wanted to watch and I didn't even know it! A bunch of tourists to the Northern Territory go on a wetland cruise, and their boat gets attacked by a freakishly large, even more freakishly aggressive saltie. They end up stranded on a mud island that's soon due to disappear under the rising tide, desperately trying to figure out a way back to dry land, getting picked off by the croc the whole time. It was epic. If you like straightforward, unpretentious creature horror, this film was it!
lucymonster: (horror)
Ready or Not (2019): On her wedding night, Grace's obscenely rich new in-laws rope her into a family ritual: she must play a game with them, chosen at random by drawing a card from a black box. All but one of the games are harmless; the "but one" is a murderous game of hide-and-seek, where the family has until sunrise to hunt down the target and ritually slaughter them. Guess which card Grace draws.

This was so much fun! Between this and Jennifer's Body, I've started feeling like Adam Brody should be some kind of Big Deal in last decade's horror movies, though Wikipedia tells me he hasn't actually appeared in much else. More to the point, Samara Weaving put on a truly fantastic performance. Grace had a grit and a will to live that were incredible to watch; all she was doing was trying to survive, but she quickly made herself a terror to the rest of the family, and I very much enjoyed her journey to becoming as much of a threat to them as they were to her. Her husband was the kind of spineless sack of shit it feels truly good to hate. I have a little while to wait before the sequel comes down to a sensible rental price on streaming platforms (it is very new and currently costs a full movie ticket amount to watch, but that won't last) and then I'm very much looking forward to seeing the continuation of her adventures.

Hush (2016): Maddie, a deaf woman and successful author, lives alone in the woods to work in peace on her next novel. One night she becomes the target of a sadistic serial killer. This was so damn good. Scary as fuck, sparing but VERY effective with its gore (the hand scene alskjhfalsjffd owwwwww) and has another wonderful female protagonist who never wanted any of this but, since she can't escape it, throws herself into the fight harder than her tormentor could ever have predicted. It is pure chance that I watched this and Ready or Not back to back, but between the fierce table-turning heroines and the hand gore, they make an unexpectedly good pairing, lol. The killer also put in a fantastic performance. I feel like he's going to stick in my head as a memorable villain for exactly how UNmemorable he is: normal dude, personable, casually chatty, utterly sick fuck. He is not the brightest spark, and there more than a few "dude how are you fucking this up so bad" moments, but I don't necessarily have a problem with that; there's no law that says killers all have to be ultracompetent masterminds!

Apparently there's also a TV show called Midnight Mass that is supposed to be an adaptation of Maddie's fictional bestseller. I'm finding TV shows harder to commit to than movies at the moment, but it has good reviews and I'd like to give it a go at some point.
lucymonster: (horror)
Two of these are classic horror movies. One is ??? probably horror but no one's saying it with their chests. One is a biographical crime drama that's not actually horror at all, but it's about a female serial killer, so for the purposes of this post it squeaks in.

The Lighthouse (2019): Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson are 19th century lighthouse keepers who go nuts while keeping their lighthouse. This is a critically acclaimed, multiple award-winning movie, and I am sorry to say that I heartily disliked it; imo it was one of those works of art that is so busy being clever and referential, it forgets to actually say a single word for itself. The production was gorgeous, though. It was shot in black and white with an unusual squarish ratio and the soundtrack was absolutely exquisite: grinding, ominious music; long silences; the endless beating of the sea and the violent, maddening blare of the lighthouse's foghorn. Enjoyable aesthetic experience. Plot-wise, fuck no.

Monster (2003): This is a biopic about Aileen Wuornos, an American serial killer who was executed in 2002 for the murders of seven men who picked her up for sex along highways in Florida. Possibly one of the most harrowing, heartstring-tugging things I have ever watched? Charlize Theron plays Wuornos with a desperately traumatised intensity as she pins all her hopes for love and salvation on her girlfriend Selby, who expects her to support them both through sex work while turning a blind eye both to the terrifying sexual violence Wuornos faces out on the streets and to the brutality of the solution she has found for her own safety. (Selby has her own issues: she's a young lesbian from an extremely strict, repressive middle-class Christian family. She is hopelessly naive and sheltered, completely unequipped to support herself alone but forced to leave her whole support network behind due to their homophobia.)

It doesn't feel right to have ~opinions on something that is true crime based, with families of victims still living. So all I'll say is that I can't actually imagine a version of the Aileen Wuornos story that wouldn't leave me feeling a high degree of heartache for her, whether she killed all those men because they tried to rape her (as she claimed) or out of pure hatred and greed. I daresay I'd be consumed by hate too if I'd led Wuornos' life.

The Fog (1980): On a small US coastal town's one hundredth anniversary, a mysterious supernatural fog rolls in to wreak vengeance for the sins of the founders. This is a fun, silly ghost story with a likeable main cast and some immaculate spooky vibes. I don't have much to say. The villains are SPOILER ) and I switched my brain off and enjoyed.

The Exorcist (1973): Twelve-year-old Regan gets possessed by a demon; her desperate mother, tired of endless rounds of agonising medical tests and psychiatric appointments that lead nowhere, finally enlists a Catholic priest to exorcise her. Father Karras has been suffering a crisis of faith, but helping Regan reignites the spark of his vocation. This is a wonderful, psychologically rich and nuanced film with a cast who are all impressively well developed; a lot is going on in their lives, and the plot is a little slow to start because of the time we spend getting to know them first, but I definitely don't think it was time wasted. Father Karras had an electric screen presence; every second he was on screen, my eyes were glued to him. (He was also a sad man with floppy dark hair who could throw a punch, so consider this parenthesis to be my legally mandated disclosure of bias. I am probably not eligible to serve on this jury.) I also loved Regan's mother Chris, and everything about the portrayal of Chris and Regan's mother-daughter relationship: Chris is a single mum with a busy career as a successful actress who relies on a great deal of hired help for childcare and home maintenance, but she is also shown to be a devoted mother. She and Regan deeply love, trust and moreover clearly like each other, and the movie manifested exactly none of the Oh No Working Mothers handwringing I was braced for when she was first introduced.

I did not, regrettably, find The Exorcist very scary, and am metaphorically pouring one out for it and all the other trailblazing movies that get so unfairly eclipsed by later, lesser movies rolling their flashy cars down that nice pre-blazed trail. I've seen all these scares before, and I haven't even been watching horror for that long. It has been too influential and as a sad result I'm too desensitised to fully enter into its intended atmosphere of supernatural terror. But even with all the shock value stripped away, it's still a genuinely excellent film that I'm glad to have watched and can see myself watching again. (And okay, fine, the crucifix masturbation scene did give me one decent-sized scare.)
lucymonster: (books)
One, Two, Buckle My Shoe by Agatha Christie: On a routine trip to the dentist, legendary private detective Monsieur Poirot becomes embroiled in a case of apparent suicide that looks increasingly suspicious as the bodies of other patients from that day's appointments start to pile up. This is a clever, twisty, wryly funny mystery on par with everything you'd expect from Christie; my Poirot reading has been sporadic and out of order, but he's such a vivid character that it only took a few pages before he felt like the very best of fictional acquaintances. I find it impressive in general how much Christie manages to do with so few words. Her prose is very neat and precise, with minimal but to-the-point descriptions and long passages of untagged dialogue that are nonetheless easy as anything to track. She lures you through the story at a brisk walking place - pleasant, exhilarating, but not exhausting - and then ends it all with a solution to the puzzle that you could never have guessed (well, I couldn't, anyway) but feel like you should have guessed for how well it brings together all the clues.

Carefully avoiding any spoilers, I will just say that I really liked the pairing of crime-thriller-worthy events with the utterly prosaic setting of a dentist's office, and then also, paired with that, Poirot's nobly naive insistence on the value of ordinary human life in the face of grand ideologies. IDK, it was all just so nice, for a story with so many corpses in it. Our girl Agatha was perfecting the cosy mystery long before the genre was a twinkle in the zeitgeist's eye.

H. P. Lovecraft: I have never attempted Lovecraft before, but I came in abundantly forewarned of his 1) breathtaking racism and 2) rather unlovely prose. The latter I mitigated somewhat by listening to this first handful of stories in audio format, with a good narrator to make up for the lifelessness; the latter can't be helped. I enjoyed myself, anyway!

Three novellas/short stories )

Confessions by Augustine of Hippo, trans. R. S. Pine-Coffin: And now for something completely different! I've been plugging away at this all month, and it has been an experience. Augustine (St. Augustine in the saint-having traditions) is a 4th century church father, theologian, philosopher and priest from Roman Africa. He was from a mixed-faith family and his mother attempted to raise him Christian, but in his twenties he fell in with the Manichaeans (a dualist religion incorporating elements of Christianity as well as other faiths). Augustine was fiercely intelligent, passionately interested in philosophy and rhetoric, and never fully satisfied by the Manichaean doctrines; it took him a decade of uncertainty and questioning, but eventually, at age 32, he embraced Christianity wholeheartedly after being taught an allegorical approach to reading scripture that resolved all his objections to the faith.

Cut for length )
lucymonster: (faitheating)
I've slowed my horror movie roll a bit, mainly because the work I'm doing on my fanbinding project lends itself to the same headspace and timeslot as movie-watching. But I have not lost interest! Today's unintentional mini-theme is toxic female friendship, yay.

Jennifer's Body (2009): A struggling indie band turns to Satan to give them their big break, but the girl they chose for their virgin sacrifice was unfortunately not a virgin. Instead of dying, the ritual causes Jennifer to become possessed by a demon, and leaves her devoted best friend Anita ("Needy") struggling to come to terms with a Jennifer who is mostly the same cool, hot, vacuous, slightly mean teenage girl she's always been, only now she feeds off the flesh of her male classmates.

I'm boggling that I never saw this in cinemas when it came out, because it was fucking laser-targeted at my demographic (emo kids who were coming of age in the late 2000s), but I can't recall any of my friends even talking about it. I recognised almost every band on the soundtrack. I recognised a lot of faces too: Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Amy Sedaris, Chris Pratt, that guy from The O.C. Anyway, it was a great time! If I hadn't been out and rug-munching for several years by the time it was released, that Jennifer/Needy makeout scene would have given me the mother of all sexual awakenings too, lol. Those heady teenage hormones were off the charts.

Fall (2022): A year after her husband's death in a rock climbing accident, Becky allows her best friend Hunter (a youtuber who has built her brand on daredevil stunts) to goad her into climbing a decommissioned TV tower together. The tower is 2000ft/610m high, rusted through, and due to be demolished soon. They tell no one what they're doing and pack no food or survival gear. The ladder gives way beneath them, and the two end up trapped on a tiny open platform right at the top.

I fucking loved this, okay? Looking at reviews after I'd finished watching made me feel kind of dumb, because everyone else was all "too much suspension of disbelief" and "saw the twist coming a mile off" and "leads are so dumb they deserve it" while I was just there like 🤯🤯🤯. Hot women with a dangerous physical hobby! Extreme heights! Confined to a single location with literally no room to maneuver, and somehow still heart-stoppingly tense and exciting the whole way through! Yes the leads are a bit dumb and yes the filmmakers are less than 100% married to realism the whole way through. (There's no point me defending the twist, because I am a very naive viewer; most twists catch me off guard, whether they're well executed or not.) But all I really wanted was attractive, dysfunctional women and vertigo-inducing aerial shots and to spend a decent portion of the runtime yelling "no no no don't do that!" through my fingers, and you couldn't get a purer, more intense experience of those things than this film if you injected them intravenously.

In Fall-adjacent news, I am greatly amused by the existence of this Getting Stuck in Terrible Places Cinematic Universe list on letterboxd. Some of these films I have already seen over the years; some are on my watch list; others I have never even heard of. But a person who can put Saw, The Hunger Games, Snowpiercer and The Blair Witch Project all together on a themed list and have it make perfect, intuitive sense is a person I can respect.
lucymonster: (i have spoken)
I'm just. I'm ALL OVER THE PLACE. And have drunk rather a lot of gin this evening, meaning you guys get to hear the unfiltered reactions while I'm too compromised to try and make myself sound smart about any of it.

Reading: Saint Augustine's Confessions (blowing my mind, this guy can really Theology) and Elyne Mitchell's The Silver Brumby (haven't read since I was like eight, but remembering everything literally beat for beat as I read, this is honestly such amazing children's literature and I can't wait to post about it in more detail when I'm done).

Watching: The Autopsy of Jane Doe (scared the everloving shit out of me), Gonjiam: Haunted Asylum (didn't scare me even a tiny bit, I literally set up a VPN just so I could access this, everyone was saying it's so scary but it isn't), and Inside the World's Toughest Prisons (are you guys going to think I'm a complete fucking weirdo if I admit that this is a semi-regular comfort watch for me).

Listening: Iron Maiden. So much Iron Maiden. I've been trying to do deep dives into a bunch of different albums, but right now I'm so in love with A Matter of Life and Death that I don't want to move on to a different album, and it's rather hampering my progress.
lucymonster: (horror)
The Dark and the Wicked (2020): The grown children of Texas farmers come home to support their dying father in his last days, but a demonic presence is hanging over the house, filling the family's heads with terrifying hallucinations and the urge to commit brutal acts of self-mutilation. This film is style over substance, but the style was genuinely extremely good, so...I liked it, I think? The plot is paper thin and the veneer of "elevated" horror is hardly worth analysing. It's a haunted house story. Terrible forces do terrible things to ordinary people and there's no way to stop them. But the focus is on slow, building dread over action; the atmosphere is stark and lonely, full of sweeping shots of the farmstead that are sometimes so underlit you have to squint and other times so overexposed it sears your eyes, all clearly done intentionally; the soundtrack doesn't miss a single trick to get your heart beating faster. Everything is beautiful and horribly off-kilter.

Do I see myself wanting to rewatch this? No, probably not. The fucky lighting made my eyes hurt and there's nothing about any of the characters that makes me crave more time with them. But the movie gave me exactly what I wanted: to feel so scared it was a genuine struggle not to close my eyes and cower away from the screen. Only one other movie has so far given me such an intense, lizard-brain fright, and that was The Tunnel. We all have our specific fears; I guess "inhuman figure approaches slowly, jerkily, inexorably out of the darkness" must be mine.

It Follows (2014): Hahaha, and then after that realisation I decided to watch a film where an inhuman figure approaches slowly, jerkily and inexorably for like ninety minutes straight. Three guesses what kind of emotional state I was in after this one. 😅

It was great, though! It's about a murderous horror that is sexually transmitted; once it has latched onto you, the only way to get rid of it is to pass it on to someone else. Until then, it follows you. Everywhere. At a slow and steady walking pace. It can take on any human form, it knows where you are at all times, and it never stops. You can buy yourself time by getting far away, but sooner or later it will catch back up; if it gets its hands on you, it will kill you. So, obviously, our college-age protagonist Jay catches It after sleeping with a guy she's been dating, who it turns out seduced her under a false identity out of desperation to save his own life. Her sister and a handful of childhood friends rally around her, and together they try to find a solution to the curse while staying ahead of the pursuit. It's a really interesting, self-aware but not satirical twist on the "sex = death" slasher trope, and also REALLY FUCKING SCARY. (I mean, we've established that slow pursuit scares me shitless; others' mileage may vary, idk.)

On the other hand, the main girl looked so much like Hilary Duff that it kept throwing me out of the story, and the time period was jarringly out of whack. Everyone drove vintage cars, had 80s wall phones and 90s TV sets on which they watched 1950s horror movies, the internet didn't seem to exist but one character had this bizarre, kitschy little clamshell e-reader on which she was reading Dostoevsky...apparently it was supposed to feel "timeless" and "dreamlike" but I just found it distracting. Not enough to negate how much I liked the actual storyline, but it was an irritating little niggle, and in general I found a lot of the aesthetic choices in this movie odd and unappealing. Horror movies can be scary, thematically interesting AND pretty! This one only scored two out of three, and that just felt like an unfortunate waste.

Hell House LLC Origins: The Carmichael Manor (2023): A true crime vlogger takes her real estate agent girlfriend and her schizophrenic brother to stay several nights at a remote manor that was the site of a grisly domestic homicide, and that also (she learns, to her very great misfortune) turns out to be connected to the infamous Abaddon Hotel tragedy. [personal profile] snickfic promised me 1) a lesbian main couple and 2) even scarier clowns than the ones in the original movie, and has proved faithful on both counts. These were some seriously NASTY clowns, and I really liked the main couple with their Mulder and Scully-Against-Her-Will dynamic. I thought the true crime fan angle was a very good justification for the whole investigation setup, even as it set my teeth on edge (in a fuck-you way, not a scary horror way - I have some strong views on the true crime genre and the fannish community around it, but we are not going to get into that here, because life is short and outrage is cheap and I should be in bed right now instead of blogging about horror movies in the first place).

Anyway, yeah, really enjoyed this! Don't have much to say about it, but really enjoyed it.
lucymonster: (vampires again)
I'm bouncing around the media landscape like a pinball at the moment. No idea why but I'm having a great time! Icon in honour of Bela Lugosi, who is forever and always a vampire in my heart if not in this specific film selection.

His Girl Friday (1940): This is a really fun screwball comedy about a slick, dodgy newspaper editor trying to win back his journalist ex-wife by manipulating her into covering one last story for him. Hildy is a brilliant reporter who excels at her aggressive, fast-paced job and is very much "one of the guys" among her colleagues - including her ex-husband Walter, hence the divorce. Walter's life revolves around the newspaper; he even cancelled their honeymoon so they could both rush to the site of a breaking story. Hildy pines for a more traditional feminine life in which she is romanced and protected, free to maintain a peaceful home and raise children while her husband works a steady, predictable job to provide for them. To that end, she has left Walter and become engaged to insurance salesman Bruce. The meat of the movie is a chaotic farce in which Walter deploys a wild barrage of sneaky, often criminal tactics to lure Hildy away from Bruce and reawaken her love for her career (and, by assumed extension, for him).

The gender dynamics in this were fascinating. Hildy's professional competence is about the only thing the film takes seriously; through all the wacky hijinks she is universally respected as a good reporter, with no trace of any "for a woman" caveat. (Nearly every other woman who appears onscreen is a secretary or telephone operator, and in brief interactions Hildy is as collegial with them as she is with her more "esteemed" fellow reporters, but they don't really feature much one way or another.) Of course Hildy's whole inner conflict revolves around the unchallenged premise that women, as a class, belong in the domestic sphere; but Hildy herself is the only character who seems to view the issue along gendered lines. For everyone else, it's about journalists vs non-journalists; people who can be satisfied with staid domestic life (of whom Hildy's classically masculine new fiancé is the prime example) versus people who crave the thrill and challenge of the fast-paced media world. The other career reporters all shake their heads and predict a swift end to the whole Hildy/Bruce business. No way will anyone as thoroughly like them as Hildy be able to stand the tedium of the American picket-fence dream for more than six months. I'm not saying it was some kind of feminist statement in the modern sense; I just enjoyed the nuance of how Hildy's femininity was handled. She was a great character.

The Devil Bat (1940): Bela Lugosi stars as a mad scientist with a vendetta against his employers, the owners of a cosmetics firm who have gotten rich off his designs while paying him only a tiny fraction of the profits. His genius plan for revenge is twofold: firstly he has engineered himself a giant bat large and strong enough to kill a man, and secondly he has trained the bat to become enraged at the scent of a specific chemical, which he has put into a specially formulated aftershave. Target applies aftershave to neck. Bat swoops in to tear out jugular. Bam! Greedy capitalist gets what he deserves.

This was every bit as ridiculous as I hoped it would be. It's billed as straightforward horror, but it's really more of a bat-themed, lightly murderous comedy. A lot of the action is driven by a pair of madcap journalists investigating the story, whose antics include things like using taxidermy to produce fake photos of the devil bat, doctoring out the wires that made it fly but forgetting to remove a label from the wing that says "Made in Japan". I was honestly cheering for the doctor, partly because his evil plan is so delightfully (ahem) batshit, and partly just because, you know. Bela Lugosi. Unlike the other two films in this post, this one is very much not a must-watch of 40s cinema, but it's certainly a why-the-hell-not, especially since its runtime is barely over an hour. I had fun.

The Maltese Falcon (1941): Hardboiled private detective Sam Spade gets hired under false pretences for a job that leads to the death of his business partner and ends up embroiling him in a violent, competitive criminal scheme to gain possession of an unthinkably valuable historical artefact known as the Maltese Falcon. This is, of course, one of the films noir and has all the elements you'd expect: a cynical, street-smart protagonist, a beautiful femme fatale for him to have dangerous chemistry with, a supporting cast of gangsters who are forever double-crossing each other.

I'm kind of drawing a blank on what to say about this one, but I honestly really loved it and it has whet my appetite for more film noir. The pacing is much slower than today's modern crime thrillers and that really worked for me; the latter tend to stress me out so much that I have to be in just the right mood to watch them. This was tense and exciting without forcing me to lie down afterwards. The whole chiaroscuro aesthetic was absolutely gorgeous. My favourite moment was when the femme fatale slaps a gangster, who goes to hit her back, only for Sam to leap in and bellow in the man's face, 'When you're slapped, you'll take it and you'll like it!' Iconic, honestly. Sam Spade is a true ally to femdom fans everywhere. More men should learn from his example.
lucymonster: (horror)
Help, I started watching these notorious, near universally panned exploitation films because I was in a bad mood and wanted something to be angry about, except I accidentally ended up thinking they were KIND OF FUCKING GREAT, ACTUALLY, and now I am forced to declare myself a card-carrying member of the Dead Rapists Cinematic Universe fanclub. I swear with hand on heart that I'm not trying to be iconoclastic here. I just. I thought these were good films. I enjoyed them. I can see where the critical consensus is coming from and I don't think it's Wrong, per se, but I also really just completely disagree, which I guess means that I am either a bad feminist or (I'd prefer to think) just vibrating on a different frequency than the mainstream in this case.

Anyway, backing up a bit: I Spit On Your Grave is an extremely controversial rape-revenge horror movie franchise. It's about...well, I guess the genre label is pretty self-explanatory. A rape survivor exacts murderous revenge on her rapists. The original film was released in 1978, and widely banned or censored around the world for its graphic depictions of sexual violence. (A brutal gang rape scene takes up 30 full minutes of runtime.) A remake came out in 2010, followed by a couple of sequels; in 2019, the original director and lead actress returned with a sequel to the 1978 version. So far I have only watched the 2010 remake and its 2015 direct sequel. I plan to watch the 1978 as well but will probably skip the 2019 sequel (which apparently kills my first movie Final Girl blorbo) and am undecided on the 2013 middle movie of the remake trilogy (unrelated plot with all-new characters).

I'm going to put the entire rest of this post under a cut for obvious reasons. But tl;dr, if you can stomach the sexual violence, these movies absolutely have a place in the feminist conversation imo and are very impactful, successful horror in their own right.

Potentially triggering discussion of potentially triggering films under the cut )

Has anyone else here watched any of these movies? Or want to use my "objectively" bad taste new obsession as a jumping-off point to gush about your own favourite exploitation media? Just tell me I'm not alone here in actually really, really liking something I'm by all accounts supposed to hate.
lucymonster: (horror)

[VID] Bloody Creature Poster Girl by [archiveofourown.org profile] satanicnightjar: A tribute to monster/demon/slasher/psycho girls in film. Content warnings for blood, gore, violence, and general R-rated content.

Profile

lucymonster: (Default)
lucymonster

September 2026

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 11th, 2026 01:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios